Health systems effects of successive emergency health and nutrition projects: an embedded retrospective case study analysis in Sudan and Pakistan.

Despite increasing attention to the concept of a humanitarian-development nexus in recent years, limited research is available to improve health systems strengthening practice within humanitarian programmes. We used an exploratory, systematic, embedded, multiple case study design to discern systems effects of successive Save the Children chronic emergency health and nutrition projects implemented in Sudan and Pakistan between 2011 and 2018. We used textual analysis to code 63 documents focused on eight themes using NVivo 11.0. This was supplemented by six key informant interviews. Findings offer a complex and mixed picture, with contributions to systems strengthening in community systems, their linkages to health management structures, and human resources for health. Projects with primary mandates for urgent service delivery progressively found systems strengthening opportunities, through a combination of tacit choices and explicit objectives. In both countries, some 'parallel systems' were set in place initially, with immediate gains (e.g. quality of services) only occasionally accompanied by enhanced systems capacity to sustain them. Cycles of implementation, however, achieved financial transition of 'macro-costs' to the government (e.g. facilities in Sudan, staff in Pakistan) through indirect pathways and the influence of pluralistic governmental structures themselves. Opportunities were taken, or missed, based on dynamic relationships within the government-development partners eco-system. Transition steps also came with unintended effects and drops in intensity. Both project contributions to systems strengthening and our own study were limited by substantial gaps in evaluation and documentation processes. We provide cautious recommendations based on the literature and our two case studies. Even mid-size chronic emergency projects can and should make meaningful and explicit contributions to systems strengthening. This contribution will, however, depend on the development eco-system context, and development of better collective intelligence (coordination, evaluation and learning, benchmarking, accountability) to improve individual projects' adaptive management efforts to improve fit with evolving national systems.

Barriers and enablers for practicing kangaroo mother care (KMC) in rural Sindh, Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: More than 2.5 million newborns die each year, accounting for 47% of children dying worldwide before their age of five years. Complications of preterm birth are the leading cause of death among newborns. Pakistan is amongst the top ten countries with highest preterm birth rate per 1000 live births. Globally, Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) has emphasized on Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) as an essential component of neonatal health initiatives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted this qualitative study with 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs) and 14 focus group discussion (FGD) sessions, in two health facilities of Sindh, Pakistan during October-December 2016, to understand the key barriers and enablers to a mother's ability to practice KMC and the feasibility of implementing and improving these practices. RESULTS: The findings revealed that community stakeholders were generally aware of health issues especially related to maternal and neonatal health. Both the health care providers and managers were supportive of implementing KMC in their respective health facilities as well as for continuous use of KMC at household level. In order to initiate KMC at facility level, study respondents emphasized on ensuring availability of equipment, supplies, water-sanitation facility, modified patient ward (e.g., curtain, separate room) and quality of services as well as training of health providers as critical prerequisites. Also in order to continue practicing KMC at household level, engaging the community and establishing functional referral linkage between community and facilities were focused issues in facility and community level FGDs and IDIs. CONCLUSION: The study participants considered it feasible to initiate KMC practice at health facility and to continue practicing at home after returning from facility. Ensuring facility readiness to initiate KMC, improving capacity of health providers both at facility and community levels, coupled with focusing on community mobilization strategy, targeting specific audiences, may help policy makers and program planners to initiate KMC at health facility and keep KMC practice continued at household level.